A core-allocation family for generalized holding cost games
نویسنده
چکیده
Inventory situations, introduced in Meca et al. (2004), study how a collective of firms can minimize its joint inventory cost by means of cooperation. Depending on the information revealed by the individual firms, they analyze two related cooperative TU games: inventory cost games and holding cost games, and focus on proportional division mechanisms to share the joint cost. It turns out that holding cost games are permutationally concave, hence balanced. Moreover, the proportional rule leads to a core allocation of the corresponding game that can even be sustained as a population monotonic allocation scheme (Sprumont, 1990). In this paper, we extend the class of holding cost games to the generalized holding cost games. We then focus on the study of the core structure for the new class of balanced games. We introduce a core-allocation family which is called N-rational solution family. It is proved that there exists a particular relation of inclusion between the former and the core. In addition, a new proportional rule called minimum square proportional rule, which is an N-rational solution, is studied.
منابع مشابه
Cooperative Benefit and Cost Games under Fairness Concerns
Solution concepts in cooperative games are based on either cost games or benefit games. Although cost games and benefit games are strategically equivalent, that is not the case in general for solution concepts. Motivated by this important observation, a new property called invariance property with respect to benefit/cost allocation is introduced in this paper. Since such a property can be regar...
متن کاملDynamic realization games in newsvendor inventory centralization
Consider a set N of n(> 1) stores with single-item and single-period nondeterministic demands like in a classic newsvendor setting with holding and penalty costs only. Assume a risk-pooling single-warehouse centralized inventory ordering option. Allocation of costs in the centralized inventory ordering corresponds to modelling it as a cooperative cost game whose players are the stores. It has b...
متن کاملApproximating the least core value and least core of cooperative games with supermodular costs
We study the approximation of the least core value and the least core of supermodular cost cooperative games. We provide a framework for approximation based on oracles that approximately determine maximally violated constraints. This framework yields a 3-approximation algorithm for computing the least core value of supermodular cost cooperative games, and a polynomial-time algorithm for computi...
متن کاملDuality Approaches to Economic Lot-Sizing Games
Sharing common production, resources and services to reduce cost are important for not for profit operations due to limited and mission-oriented budget and effective cost allocation mechanisms are essential for encouraging effective collaborations. In this paper, we illustrate how rigorous methodologies can be developed to derive effective cost allocations to facilitate sustainable collaboratio...
متن کاملFuzzy transferable-utility games: a weighted allocation and related results
By considering the supreme-utilities among fuzzy sets and the weights among participants simultaneously, we introduce the supreme-weighted value on fuzzy transferable-utility games. Further, we provide some equivalent relations to characterize the family of all solutions that admit a potential on weights. We also propose the dividend approach to provide alternative viewpoint for the potential a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Math. Meth. of OR
دوره 65 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007